format ELF64 executable
+;; "Syscalls" {{{
+
+;; [NOTE] Volatile registers Linux (syscalls) vs UEFI
+;;
+;; Linux syscalls: RAX, RCX, R11
+;; UEFI: RAX, RCX, R11, RDX, R8, R9, R10
+
+;; We are in the process of replacing our dependency on Linux with a dependency
+;; on UEFI. The following macros attempt to isolate what would be syscalls in
+;; Linux; thus, we will be able to replace these with UEFI-based implementations,
+;; and in theory we should expect the program to work.
+
+;; Print a string of a given length.
+;;
+;; Input:
+;; - RCX = Pointer to buffer
+;; - RDX = Buffer length
+;;
+;; Clobbers: RAX, RCX, R11, RDI, RSI
+macro sys_print_string {
+ mov rax, 1
+ mov rdi, 1
+ mov rsi, rcx
+ syscall
+}
+
+;; }}}
+
;; The code in this macro is placed at the end of each Forth word. When we are
;; executing a definition, this code is what causes execution to resume at the
;; next word in that definition.
forth_asm EMIT, 'EMIT'
pushr rsi
pushr rax
- mov rax, 1
- mov rdi, 1
- lea rsi, [rsp]
+
+ lea rcx, [rsp]
mov rdx, 1
- syscall
+ sys_print_string
+
add rsp, 8
popr rax
popr rsi
;; Takes a string (in the form of a pointer and a length on the stack) and
;; prints it to standard output.
forth_asm TELL, 'TELL'
- mov rbx, rsi
- mov rcx, rax
+ pushr rax
+ pushr rsi
- mov rax, 1
- mov rdi, 1
- pop rdx ; Length
- pop rsi ; Buffer
- syscall
+ pop rdx ; Length
+ pop rcx ; Buffer
+ sys_print_string
- mov rax, rcx
- mov rsi, rbx
+ popr rsi
+ popr rax
next
;; Exit the program cleanly.
loop .flip
;; Print the buffer
- mov rax, 1
- mov rdi, 1
- mov rsi, .buffer
+ mov rcx, .buffer
mov rdx, [.printed_length]
- syscall
+ sys_print_string
;; Restore RSI and continue execution
pop rsi